<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nebraska Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu</link>
	<description>a scholarly journal published by the students of the University of Nebraska College of Law</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Nebraska MCLE Rules Leave Some Lawyers Behind</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=628</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=628#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by John Wiltse[0]
On November 26, 2008, the Nebraska Supreme Court adopted rules[1] requiring most active[2] members of the Nebraska State Bar Association to continue their legal education throughout their careers.  The goal of the rules is to enhance attorney competence so that they may better serve their clients.[3]  Attorney compliance with the continuing legal education (CLE) requirements becomes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=628</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White Robes and Black Robes: The Nebraska Supreme Court&#8217;s Vacatur in State v. Henderson</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=610</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=610#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Student Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Daniel J. Hassing[0]
Oftentimes in the law, the outcome in a case is determined by what has previously happened procedurally.  Sometimes, the simple, common sense result is precluded because of the procedural posture of a dispute.  But this bizarre result stands because the procedural requirements are part of the rule of law upon which our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=610</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FORE!  A Heads-Up to Nebraska Real Estate Attorneys After the Skyline Woods Golf Course Case</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=582</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=582#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Daniel J. Hassing[0]
 This past December, the Nebraska Supreme Court made a landmark decision in Nebraska real estate law in Skyline Woods Homeowners Ass’n v. Broekemeier.[1] In this decision, for the first time, Nebraska recognized implied restrictive covenants[2] inferred from a common scheme of development. Such covenants are not recorded expressly in the chain of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=582</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preventing and Suppressing Gang Crimes through Comprehensive Anti-Gang Legislation: A Solution to Nebraska’s Gang Problem</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=561</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=561#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[EDITOR'S NOTE: From time to time, the Bulletin will publish "white papers."  These papers come from a number of student sources; they could be seminar papers, class papers, or case notes that have not yet been selected for publication.  The Bulletin's goal in publishing these materials is to provide practitioners with the background research that was done for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=561</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s No Escape: The Plaintiff&#8217;s Right to Dismiss After the Submission of a Motion for Summary Judgment or a Motion to Dismiss in Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=507</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=507#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By John P. Lenich[0]
Section 25-601(1) provides that the plaintiff can voluntarily dismiss an action without prejudice anytime before final submission.[1]  “Final submission contemplates submission on both the law and the facts when nothing remains to be done in order to render the submission complete.”[2]  A final submission occurs in a bench trial when the parties [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=507</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SORNA in the Eighth Circuit</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=431</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=431#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Commentaries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Student Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Daniel Hassing[0]
Child exploitation and other sexual crimes are some of the most perverse and pervasive crimes in the United States.  Cases such as those involving Elizabeth Smart and Jessica Lunsford grab headlines and demonstrate the depravity of some criminals.[1]   In an effort to combat such offenders, Congress enacted the Adam Walsh Child Protection [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=431</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on LB 36: Problems with the Proposed Bill to Institute Lethal Injection in Nebraska</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=405</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=405#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Eric Berger[0]
Introduction
In February 2008, the Nebraska Supreme Court held in State v. Mata that Nebraska’s electrocution procedure violated the Nebraska constitution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.[1]  Mata left Nebraska in the curious position of having the death penalty on the books without a constitutional method of executing death sentences.  In December 2008, Nebraska Attorney [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=405</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capital One Auto Finance v. Osborn, 515 F.3d 817 (8th Cir. 2008):  Surrendering Proper Interpretation of the “Hanging Paragraph” to Allow an Unsecured Deficiency Claim Following Surrender of a 910-Vehicle in Chapter 13—Further Evidence of the Need for Congressional Reform</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=388</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=388#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
[EDITOR'S NOTE: From time to time, the Bulletin will publish "white papers."  These papers come from a number of student sources; they could be seminar papers, class papers, or case notes that have not yet been selected for publication.  The Bulletin's goal in publishing these materials is to provide practitioners with the background research that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=388</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick and Nebraska Employment Law: Interpreting Contracts and Good Faith</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=328</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=328#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Steven L. Willborn[0]
Nebraska has followed the national trend limiting employment at will.  It recognizes oral contracts,[1] limits discharges that violate public policy,[2] and requires employers who promise jobs to deliver them.[3]  None of these were recognized during the heyday of employment at will.
Last fall, the supreme court issued Pick v. Norfolk Anesthesia, P.C.,[4] an interesting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=328</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Extraordinary Lawyers Saved an Ordinary Trial Judge from Mucking Up an Extraordinary Case</title>
		<link>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=262</link>
		<comments>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=262#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawreview.unl.edu/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Richard G. Kopf[0]
When a trial judge like me gets a high-profile case, the sphincter tightens.  Visions of Judge Lance Ito[1] and the O.J. murder case dance in the mind like demented sugar plum fairies on meth.  Taking the suggestion of the editors of the Bulletin,[2] herewith is a short piece on how great lawyers saved my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lawreview.unl.edu/?feed=rss2&amp;p=262</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
