The Single-Subject Rule and the Politics of Constitutional Amendment in Initiative States
Jonathan L. Marshfield, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Changing the Rules for Direct Democracy in the Twenty-First Century in Response to Animal Welfare, Marijuana, Minimum Wage, Medicaid, Elections, and Gambling Initiatives
John Dinan, Wake Forest University
Federal Experimentation Through State Constitutional Initiatives
Robinson Woodward-Burns, Howard University
Direct Democracy: From Theory to Practice Symposium Direct Democracy: From Theory to Practice Symposium: Introduction
Anthony B. Schutz, University of Nebraska College of Law
A Dubious Proposition of Law: Why Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Regulations Is at Odds with Nebraska Law
Trevor J. Rogers, J.D., 2022, University of Nebraska College of Law
"This Comment argues that Justice Papik’s Prokop concurrence is correct. But he is correct not just because the Nebraska Supreme Court improperly adopted a questionable doctrine from federal law and because Nebraska’s APA prohibits deference, but also because judicial deference to agency interpretations of regulations clashes with Nebraska Supreme Court precedent and violates Nebraska’s Constitution."
All Rise: Pursuing Equity in Oral Argument Evaluation
Rachel Stabler, Associate Clinical Professor of Law, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law
"The nature of a traditional oral argument, where a student stands before a judging panel to present an oral argument based on a written brief, makes anonymous grading impossible. This introduces tension for those called on to evaluate oral arguments, whether as a required component of coursework, as part of a moot court competition, or in another setting. How can an evaluator who does not have the benefit of anonymity nonetheless guard against biases affecting the evaluation of an oral argument?"
The Separation of Legislative Powers in the Initiative Process
Anthony Johnstone, University of Montana Blewett School of Law
Bringing Order to Chaos: Reviving Uniformity and Balance Within Nebraska’s Rental Housing Laws
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA COLLEGE OF LAW
The Hijacking: The Remnants of Morrissey-Wolff Due Process in Solitary Confifinement after Sandin v. Conner
Russell E. Lovell II, Drake University Law School
Play Like a Girl: Bostock, Title IX’s Promise, and the Case for Transgender Inclusion in Sports
Rachel Tomlinson Dick, University of Nebraska College of Law